Showing posts with label Milena Plebs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Milena Plebs. Show all posts

PARADISO-in its 16th year of Friday Evening Milongas
"for the love of tango"

Toronto tangueros and tangueras thank 

MILENA PLEBS 

for an outstanding workshop and 

a marvellous performance with 

PABLO PUGLIESE! 



THANKS TO 2 GREATS OF TANGO!

Brief Explanation of Salon Tango & Milonguero Tango from the Tango List

Salon tango - the woman takes long back steps.
Milonguero - the steps are shorter and more together.
Salon tango - wider giros - you must pull away from the man (the left arm slides to the upper arm) to give your more space to move.
Milonguero - the giros are closer together and can be half turns as well.
Salon tango - fancier footwork along with caminata, giro, ocho
Milonguero-caminata, giro, ocho
Salon Tango-variations in the embrace although always close (No butts sticking out)
Milonguero - no left arm of the woman hanging over the shoulder. No butts sticking out.
The two are actually almost identical; the main difference being the length of the steps and the footwork.

Milonga Afuera

Milonga Afuera thanks everyone who participated
in this
outdoor milonga!!!
See you in 2008


Scroll down for interviews

Milena Plebs Analyzes Current Scene


Remarkable dancer and choreographer analyzes the current scene and talks about the need to explore new tango dance possibilities, to avoid crystallization.
(Publ. 03-07-2007)

By Laura Falcoff

“It would be good for tango to continue evolving, so that it could stay alive and avoid crystallization of forms,” says Milena Plebs, who, as dancer, choreographer and also as a qualified observer, is interested in how this dance shows itself and changes.
Her view is particularly appreciated in a milieu that recognizes her as the great renovator of the tango dance scene alongisde Miguel Angel Zotto, starting with the creation of the Tango x 2 company – which they shared until 1997.
¿How do you think the development of the tango dance is possible? Along what tracks? I am thinking of how I can do it, or how I can get others do to it through what I write. Wishing tango to keep on evolving, to foster new forms, is not a fanciful wish. What usually happens is that when something new crops up, it soon crystallizes and you can see clones repeating the same sequences, dancing couples who copy each other, perhaps to different music but with the same forms.
In what way? By increasing the value of improvisation as a unique moment from which new forms can arise. What’s your opinion of the tango you see at milongas and the tango you see on stage? Let’s leave aside tango at dance houses, which perhaps is not worth mentioning. Just like it’s not worth mentioning championships, either. As to the question, I think, firstly, that instructors should take a longer time and more effort to explore the many possibilities each dance instance opens up.
Tango is made up of certain elements, certain steps, which can be combined in different forms. Students, and dancers in general –some people know about this, but very few- should be taught that the end of each step leaves the door open to different possibilities. And to those countless possible combinations which your proposal aims at. Usually, dancers are taught blocks of sequences which become very difficult to break up later. You will see dancers, both at milongas and on stage, who, when starting a sequence, do not stop until they end it. That sequence may be formed by, let’s say, ten steps, and each of them gives you the chance to break up the sequence with maybe two or three different alternatives.
A more active approach should be taken when learning to dance tango, rather than a passive one, taking what the instructor gives me or what I copy from a video.
Improvisation is an action in the present continuous, choreography is in the past. Could you expand on this idea? Choreography is present the moment you create it with your partner during rehearsals, when you are searching for steps. Once it becomes settled and is repeated, it is no longer present, it is past. Do you consider, then, that improvisation could, or should, be taken on stage? I do not have an answer to that today. I only speak about things I think about; let debate take place among everybody. What I can say is that dancers who prepare their choreographies must take pains so that their creation will not look too automatic, too fixed…too boring. A very basic and obvious piece of advice to prevent this is to keep your mark, to have the man keep marking movements on stage because the dynamics that arise from this are totally different. I think it’s all about looking for the way to shorten distances between choreography dancing and spontaneous dancing. I’m not saying that you should do away with choreography, but that it should preserve the freshness and organic spirit of improvised dancing.